Trump federal election interference case sent back to trial court after SCOTUS ruling

On July 1, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled on a case related to former President Donald Trump and interference in the federal election. In a 7-2 decision, the court determined that Congress has the authority to obtain Trump's tax returns and other financial records as part of a legislative investigation. The case was sent back to the lower courts to reexamine the scope of the powers Congress has when conducting these types of investigations, effectively sending it back to trial. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented. This case has been a part of a long legal battle regarding the degree to which a sitting president's personal and business records can be subject to investigation and scrutiny. It holds significant implications for the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of the US government. The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, underscored the importance of accountability and transparency in government, and the necessity for Congress to have access to necessary information to carry out its constitutional responsibilities. However, he also noted the need for balance and the consideration of presidential harassment. Please note that this information may change as the case progresses, as lower courts review the matter again following the SCOTUS ruling.